|
|
 |
Statement of Intent 2009-2012
OUTPUT 4
Exemptions and authorisations - considering and deciding on applications for exemptions from the provisions of the Securities Act 1978, Securities Markets Act 1988 and the Securities Regulations 1983; considering and deciding on applications for authorisation of market participants, including futures exchanges and dealers, trustees and statutory supervisors; reviewing existing authorisations.
Activities
- Receive and consider applications for exemption from securities law
- Review existing exemptions
- Undertake special review projects relating to policy on exemptions
- Authorise futures dealers and exchanges
- Consider amendments to futures exchange rules
- Approve NZFOX participant rules
- Approve trustees and statutory supervisors
- Review existing authorisations
Performance measures
Exemptions and authorisations |
Performance standards |
| 2009/2010
Forecast |
2008/09 achievements as estimated at 31 March 2009 |
| Quantity |
|
|
| Consider all applications for exemptions and authorisations of market participants |
All applications |
All applications |
| Review existing exemption notices and authorisations |
As required |
As required |
| Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
| The Regulations Review Committee does not recommend disallowance of notices, and notices are not successfully judicially reviewed |
100% |
100% |
| A Statement of Reasons published in each notice explains the policy basis for the exemption |
100% |
100% |
|
|
|
| Proportion of notices issued which comply with the Commission’s internal processes |
100% |
100% |
|
|
|
| Timeliness |
|
|
| Percentage of exemption applications and authorisations completed within 6 weeks of receiving all necessary information or within other period agreed with applicant |
100% |
100% |
| Cost |
|
|
| Expenditure allocated to exemptions and authorisations |
7% |
8% |
OUTPUT 5
International cooperation and recognition - promoting New Zealand's markets as well regulated, keeping abreast of developments in global standard setting and contributing the Commission's views to this process.
Activities
- Promote New Zealand's markets and regulatory environment
- Take part in the work of IOSCO's
- Executive Committee (Jane Diplock is Chairman of this committee)
- Asia Pacific Regional Committee (Jane Diplock is Vice Chairman)
- Taskforce on the Implementation of Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation
- MMOU Screening Group
- Communications Group
- Meet and confer with overseas regulators and institutional investors
- Respond to overseas enquiries about New Zealand's regulatory regime
- Participate in the international standard setting process by completing comparative surveys on securities law and regulation
- Fulfill the obligations under the IOSCO MMOU and bilateral MOUs.
- Contribute towards trans-Tasman initiatives
- Liaise with MFAT and NZTE to take opportunities to promote New Zealand's markets and regulatory environment to wider audiences
Performance measures
International cooperation and recognition |
Performance standards |
| 2009/2010
Forecast |
2008/09 achievements as estimated at 31 March 2009 |
| Quantity |
|
|
|
|
|
| Take part in the work of IOSCO’s Executive Committee, Asia Pacific Regional Committee, Implementation of Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation Committee, and the Screening Group |
100% of relevant meetings |
100% of relevant meetings |
| Take opportunities at IOSCO meetings to promote understanding of New Zealand as a well regulated market in which investors can have confidence |
100% of opportunities are taken |
100% of opportunities taken |
|
|
|
| When travelling for IOSCO take opportunities identified with MFAT and NZTE to promote New Zealand to wider business audiences as a well regulated market in which investors can have confidence |
Leveraging undertaken in 100% of relevant international destinations visited |
67% of destinations visited (target 70% of all destinations for 08/09 year) |
| Respond to requests from overseas regulators |
As required |
We responded as required |
|
|
|
| Meet with ASIC |
Twice per year |
Meetings held in March and April 2009 |
|
|
|
| Meet with overseas regulators and institutional investors |
As required |
Met with counterpart agencies, NYSE, IASB, IMF and World Bank. Addressed World Federation of Exchanges annual meeting; took part in Financial Stability Forum Asian meeting |
| Contribute towards trans-Tasman initiatives |
As required |
Contributed towards implementing mutual recognition of securities offering. News release issued |
| Quality |
|
|
| The Commission will present itself as a constructive and cooperative member of the international community of regulators. Views expressed to IOSCO will take into account the relevant New Zealand values and principles |
Presentations include information about NZ’s regulatory environment |
Met with and briefed NZTE and MFAT representatives overseas. Participated in Financial Crisis Advisory Group. Met with opinion leaders |
| The Commission makes a positive contribution to the work of IOSCO’s screening group towards IOSCO’s strategic goal for the IOSCO MMOU |
IOSCO satisfied with contribution |
Contributed to meetings resulting in 3 additional signatories to the IOSCO MMOU and 5 further jurisdictions joining Appendix B of theMMOU
With NZAID funding, launched and progressed a technical assistance project helping Papua New Guinea apply to the IOSCO MMOU |
| Cooperative work with ASIC is completed to agreed standards and timeframes |
100% |
100% |
| Timeliness |
|
|
| Presentations at meetings and responses to committees provided within agreed timeframes |
100% |
100% |
| Contribute towards trans-Tasman initiatives within agreed time |
100% |
100% |
| Obligations under MOUs with overseas regulators are fulfilled in agreed times |
100% |
100% |
| Cost |
|
|
| Expenditure allocated to international recognition |
13% |
17% |
OUTPUT 6
Public understanding - promoting public understanding of the law and practice relating to securities.
Activities
- Develop and implement initiatives to promote awareness and understanding of securities law and securities market practices and the Commission's work
- Publish The Bulletin, annual report and other documents
- Respond to public inquiries
- Manage the website
- Maintain relationships with the news media
Performance measures
Output - Public understanding |
Performance standards |
| 2009/2010
Forecast |
2008/09 achievements as estimated at 31 March 2009 |
| Quantity |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publish The Bulletin. |
4 issues |
4 issues |
| Deal with inquiries from the public |
All inquiries |
All inquiries |
|
|
|
| Manage the Commission’s website |
Website is available 95% of the time |
Website was available 99% of the time |
| Develop and implement public education projects |
N/A (not a future measure) |
1 sub-project implemented |
|
|
|
| Communicate significant regulatory actions |
100% |
N/A (new measure) |
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
|
| Readers respond that The Bulletin is interesting and relevant |
95% of survey repondents |
N/A |
| Education projects meet their set measures of success. |
N/A (not a future measure) |
Objectives for sub-project were met |
| Major communications initiatives |
90% of pre-set measures of success for each initiative |
N/A (new measure) |
| Inquiries are dealt with effectively |
Absence of material complaints |
Did not received a material number of complaints |
| Timeliness |
|
|
| The Bulletin is produced on time. |
July/Oct/Jan/April |
July/Oct/Jan/April |
| Education projects are carried out to agreed timetables |
N/A (not a future measure) |
Sub-project milestones achieved |
| Public inquiries are handled within 5 working days of receipt |
95% |
95% |
| New information is published on the website without delay |
New information is available on the website within 3 days of receipt |
On website within 3 days of receipt by Communications staff |
| Cost |
|
|
| Expenditure allocated to public understanding |
10% |
8% |
Performance measures
Takeovers Panel |
Performance standards |
| 2009/2010
Forecast |
2008/09 achievements as estimated at 31 March 2009 |
| Quantity, Quality and Timeliness |
|
|
|
|
|
| Services are provided as per the MOU between the Panel and the Commission |
In accordance with the MOU or any amendments agreed to this. |
In accordance with the MOU |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cost |
|
|
| Expenditure allocated to Takeovers Panel |
1% |
7% |
|
|
|
Expected revenue and proposed expenses (for class of output)
Class of output – Performance of Securities Market Functions (Vote Commerce)
| |
2009/10
Forecast $000 |
2008/9 Estimates $000 |
| Expected revenue |
|
|
Proposed expenses |
10,645 |
8,550 |
Operating deficit |
(1075) |
(332) |
| |
|
|
| Class of output – Litigation fund |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
2009/10 Forecast $000 |
2008/9
Estimates
$000 |
| Expected revenue |
844 |
855 |
| Proposed expenses |
844 |
611 |
| Litigation surplus |
- |
44 |
| |
|
|
| Class of output – Capital expenditure |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
2009/10
Forecast
$000 |
2008/9
Estimates
$000 |
| Investment in Securities Commission |
600 |
- |
This information is provided pursuant to section 142(2)(b), Crown Entities Act 2004.
GLOSSARY
Desired regulatory result Where the subject of our inquiries has failed to comply with the law, the desired regulatory result is the outcome that, in the circumstances of the case, best rectifies the breach, minimises any loss to investors and sends the appropriate regulatory message.
Functions For the purposes of this SOI functions are the areas of work for which the Commission is funded from Vote Commerce. The Commission's statutory functions are set out in the Securities Act 1978.
Impacts The contribution made to an outcome by a specified set of outputs and/or activities undertaken by the Commission.
Outcomes The five specific outcomes for the New Zealand securities markets that the Commission contributes to by delivering the outputs for which it is funded and achieving its objectives.
Outputs The seven services produced by the Securities Commission for third parties, excluding internal outputs.
Objectives Objectives set by the Commission which it intends to achieve within specified periods in the term of this SOI, and which also contribute to the outcomes.
Primary markets Offers of new securities made to the public.
Secondary markets Trading of securities.
|
 |