The information contained in this statement of intent is prepared in accordance with sections 141 and 142 of the Crown Entities Act 2004.
We acknowledge responsibility for the preparation of this statement of intent, including the forecast financial statements and the statement of forecast service performance, and for the judgments used in them.
![]() Jane Diplock AO Chairman 26 June 2006 |
![]() Joanna Perry Chairman Audit and Risk Review Committee 26 June 2006 |
The information in this section relates to the next three financial years 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2008/09.
Over the last five years New Zealand's securities regulatory framework has evolved significantly as the Government has carried out its programme of reforms. The first of the changes was the introduction of the Takeovers Code on 1 July 2001. The Code is administered and enforced by the Takeovers Panel, a body separate from the Commission. However, in 2000 the Commission was given the additional function of providing administrative and support services to the Panel. We have a Memorandum of Understanding with the Panel and we report on this function each year.
In 2002 new law gave the Commission a civil enforcement role for insider trading, and introduced new rules for regulation of stock exchanges, continuous disclosure by issuers, and disclosure of dealings by directors.
The following year the Commission entered into an memorandum of understanding with the NZX on regulatory co-operation and recommended that the Minister of Commerce approve the NZX Conduct Rules. We also took the lead on corporate governance and, after wide public consultation, published our Principles of Corporate Governance which heeded the strong public desire to avoid a rules-based approach.
The Securities Legislation Bill, currently before Parliament, further strengthens the regulatory framework with reforms relating to insider trading, market manipulation, investment adviser disclosure and substantial security holder disclosure. There are also changes relating to the application of securities trading law, penalties and remedies.
New laws have increased the Commission's enforcement powers and we have put these to good and appropriate use. Our aim is to get the best regulatory outcome for investors at a reasonable cost. We have flexibility in the enforcement options available to us. Not only do we have power to take insider trading cases to court, as we have done in the Tranz Rail and Provenco cases, but we have also made good use of our power to accept enforceable undertakings whereby a breach of the law can be put right swiftly and satisfactorily for investors. Each case is different, and fine judgments have to be made on how far to pursue a matter and when to settle. These are not easy decisions and we will not always get them right. However, we always strive to achieve the best outcome for shareholders.
A milestone along the way of this development was the 2003 assessment of New Zealand's financial sector, including the regulatory framework, by the IMF and World Bank. The FSAP team of experts measured our regulatory framework and its operation against the Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation published by the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).
In general New Zealand was given a good report but a number of shortcomings were noted. One of these was the lack of regulation of financial intermediaries, and another was that the legislative process for registration of an exchange did not establish standards for an exchange which has the functions of a self-regulatory organisation. The FSAP team recommended that the Securities Commission have an oversight plan for regulated exchanges, and that the plan and key findings of review under the plan are made public.
Progress has been made on these and other identified gaps. Work continues on how financial intermediaries should be regulated in this country. The Commission is reviewing the NZX's performance of its regulatory role, and has published the terms of reference of this review. Various legislation currently before the House is addressing other matters.
The Minister of Commerce and the Australian Treasurer recently signed a revised MOU reaffirming both countries' commitment to coordination of trans-Tasman business law and reducing impediments to trans-Tasman commerce. This sets new priority areas for trans-Tasman business law coordination and acknowledges the objective of a trans-Tasman single economic market.
The Ministers also signed an agreement underpinning a regime for mutual recognition of securities offers. This removes regulatory barriers for issuers wanting to offer in both New Zealand and Australia. Only one prospectus will be needed in most cases. The Commission welcomes this regime which will encourage investment between Australia and New Zealand, reduce costs for business, and increase the choice for investors.
On the regulatory front, the Commission and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have instituted regular joint meetings and have long had a close relationship at an operational level.
During the last few years the Commission has become more actively involved on the international scene, particularly in the work of IOSCO. Chairman Jane Diplock also chairs the Executive Committee of IOSCO which takes all decisions and actions necessary to achieve the objectives of the Organisation. This has served to put New Zealand on the world financial map and to promote our securities markets as markets in which investors can have confidence.
We are a signatory to the IOSCO Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MMoU) on sharing information for enforcement purposes between regulators. This has been of direct assistance to New Zealand in taking enforcement actions, and has also increased our workload as we fulfil our obligations to other regulators seeking information from this country. This cooperation is vital as financial markets and international fraud no longer have boundaries or borders.
New Zealand also supports IOSCO in its programmes to encourage countries to adopt the IOSCO Principles of Securities Regulation (which will raise the standard of regulation world-wide) and to increase the number of jurisdictions that have signed the MMoU (which enables exchange of information to counter cross-border fraud).
Much has been achieved in the past five years. The regulatory framework in New Zealand has been strengthened and legislation will be passed soon to fill more of the identified gaps, so that it can become a system of world class. More work is required to bring us to international standards in various areas, particularly the regulation of financial intermediaries.
Work is progressing on the co-regulatory arrangement between the Commission and the NZX.
New Zealanders have yet to fully recognise that the law is only the minimum when it comes to the behaviour of companies and their directors. As a country we need to create a culture in which business strives to operate in line with international best practice, not merely to not breach the law. We also have to rise to the challenge of adopting international financial reporting standards over the next few years. The Commission will continue to seek to raise standards of corporate governance and financial reporting in the future.
On the international scene it is important to continue, and to hasten, the work of IOSCO in bringing a consistent standard of regulation of securities markets and building a network of jurisdictions that can cooperate to combat international fraud.
Another area where New Zealand and most other jurisdictions fall short is financial education. The investing public is a vital part of the securities markets. We need to increase our efforts to build a generation of well-informed investors who feel confident about becoming involved in the securities markets.
The aims of all the Commission's work are to benefit investors and business alike by the existence of vibrant securities markets that are transparent, well-regulated, and attractive to investors.
The past five years have seen a great deal of work done to establish the legal basis on which to build a securities regulatory framework that is equal to the best in the world, and is recognised internationally, while being appropriate to the New Zealand situation. Important steps have been taken to develop that framework but much more needs to be done.
To build on the work to date, the Commission has developed a strategic plan for the next three years. The plan is based on six key result areas - enforcement, monitoring and market oversight, law and practice reform, exemptions and authorisations, international cooperation and recognition, and public understanding of the law and practice of securities and the Commission's presence in the markets.
The first purpose of the Commission's statement of intent is to set out the results to be achieved over the next three years, and how we will measure our achievements. It describes the environment we operate in, the people we work with, and the particular challenges we face. It also explains the main strategies we have adopted to achieve our stated objectives and thereby contribute to the outcomes, and how we will measure our achievements.
The second purpose is to present publicly our forecast financial statements and forecast statement of service performance for the next 12 months.
This statement of intent sets the broad parameters and measures for our work for the next three years. Supporting this we have a detailed strategic plan developed under our key result areas.
Progress is monitored continually and reported monthly to the Commission, and quarterly to the Minister of Commerce and the Ministry of Economic Development. Each year we report against the forecast financial statements and forecast statement of service performance in our annual report to the Minister of Commerce which is tabled in the House of Representatives.
The Commission will report against this statement of intent in its annual report for the year to 30 June 2007.
Jane Diplock AO
Chairman
The Securities Commission is New Zealand's main regulator of investments. The Commission is established under the Securities Act 1978 which determines its powers and functions. The Commission is an independent crown entity in terms of the Crown Entities Act 2004.
For details of other legislation the Commission works with see http://www.seccom.govt.nz/about/laws.shtml.
For a summary of the Commission's powers and functions see http://www.seccom.govt.nz/about/#5.
The Commission's vision is that investors can have confidence in New Zealand's securities markets so that the markets increasingly attract investment from New Zealand and overseas.
Our purpose is to strengthen investor confidence and foster capital investment in New Zealand by promoting the efficiency, integrity and cost-effective regulation of our securities markets.
The Commission's work contributes to robust and vibrant capital markets in which investors, both domestic and overseas, can have confidence. This in turn is important for New Zealand's sustainable economic development.
The outcomes we seek in our key result areas are:
The outputs chosen by the Commission to help achieve these outcomes are described in Part 2 of this statement of intent, under the statement of forecast service performance.
The Commission promotes high ethical standards in New Zealand's securities markets. If the Commission is to succeed in this, and thereby strengthen confidence in the integrity of the New Zealand capital markets, it is essential that people have confidence in the integrity of the Commission itself.
The Commission has adopted a code of ethical standards and behaviour that it expects of its Members and staff. The code of ethics is published at http://www.seccom.govt.nz/about/code-of-ethics.shtml.
The Securities Commission has not less than 5 or more than 10 Members appointed by the Governor-General on the recommendation of the Minister of Commerce. Members hold office for a term not more than five years, but may be reappointed.
One member must be a barrister or solicitor of not less than seven years' practice. Members are chosen for their knowledge of, or experience in, industry, commerce, economics, law, accountancy, public administration or securities.
Currently there is a full complement of Members. The Chairman, Jane Diplock, works full time. The other nine Members are part time, attending one full Commission meeting per month and taking part in meetings of divisions (which have the full powers of the Commission) as required to handle the business of the Commission.
For names and profiles of current Commission Members see http://www.seccom.govt.nz/about/index.shtml.
The Commission currently has 39 staff. They include 15 lawyers, four accountants, a general manager, two investigators, two communications staff, two international officers, two library and information staff and 11 support staff. Five work full time for the Takeovers Panel, and several staff work part time for the Panel.
We work in a flexible structure which enables us to form cross-disciplinary teams to address particular matters.
In broad terms we divide our work into categories relating to the primary markets (i.e. the offers of new securities made to the public) and secondary markets (i.e. the trading of securities). We also give priority to processing applications for exemptions from securities law and authorisations under securities law.
The Minister of Commerce is the responsible minister, and the Ministry of Economic Development is the monitoring department in relation to the Commission. The Commission acts independently of government and others except as required by the Securities Act 1978 or the Crown Entities Act 2004. There are no matters on which the Commission is required to consult or notify the responsible minister before exercising its statutory functions and powers. However, we work with the minister and ministry as described in paragraph 3.6.
The Commission's other stakeholders include:
Our policy on stakeholders is published at www.seccom.govt.nz/about/stakeholder-policy.shtml
As the main regulator of investments in New Zealand, the Commission has oversight of both the primary securities market and the secondary securities market.
The primary market covers investments offered to the public for the first time. These include shares, debentures, bonds, term deposits, superannuation schemes, unit trusts and other managed investments, and contributory mortgages. An issuer who offers these securities must do so in offer documents (usually a registered prospectus and an investment statement) which comply with the law. The purpose of the law is to provide the prospective investor with sufficient information to compare one investment with others and to make an informed decision on whether or not to invest.
The Commission's role relating to the primary markets is to enforce the law regarding offers of securities and advertising for securities, and to intervene if an offer is misleading, deceptive, or confusing. It can request that documents be amended and can ban offers from the market. The Commission can report publicly on behaviour or circumstances it considers worthy of comment. The Registrar of Companies also has certain enforcement powers relating to the primary markets.
The secondary market is where securities are traded e.g. on a stock exchange or futures exchange. Participants in these markets have to comply with the rules of the exchange and with the law. The Commission has powers to investigate, and take legal action on, various types of misbehaviour in the secondary markets, e.g. trading by "insiders" who have information that is not known to other shareholders.
Currently New Zealand has only one registered stock exchange, the NZX. The Commission and the NXZ have co-regulatory roles relating to the exchange under the Securities Markets Act 1988. The NZX is the front line regulator concerned with breaches of the rules of the exchange and the Commission is the statutory regulator concerned with breaches of the law.
A co-regulatory regime has the advantage of giving responsibility at the front line to those who are closest to the market, and adding public accountability to this by the oversight and statutory enforcement powers of a public regulator. As well as the existing regime for securities markets the government plans other co-regulatory arrangements in the financial sector. Good working relationships between the Commission and co-regulators are essential to the effectiveness of any co-regulatory regime. The Commission is committed to this form of regulation and to maintaining effective working relationships with its co-regulators.
The government is conducting several reviews that will affect the regulatory regime for securities markets. While the detailed design of future regulatory regimes has not yet been finalised, the general directions for reform have been made public by the government. In particular:
New Zealand has strong economic ties with Australia and is currently working with that country towards a single economic market. The government has recently entered into a revised MOU with the Australian government aimed at improving the trans-Tasman business environment. The two governments have also signed an agreement which commits to removing unnecessary regulation and costs of offers of securities made in both countries. This not only removes barriers and costs for issuers, but also broadens the choice of investments for investors. A vital part of providing these benefits is that the Commission and ASIC work closely together so that regulatory standards are consistent and duplication of work is kept to a minimum.
Securities markets are global. Transactions take place instantly around the world. This brings enormous benefits for both business and investors. It is important for New Zealand to benefit from globalisation of the markets. To do this it must be seen to have a securities regulatory framework that is on a par with international standards and best practice. This will help attract international investors to our markets.
The globalisation of the securities markets also provides opportunities for international financial fraud. To combat this regulators must be able to work together across traditional jurisdictional boundaries. These issues are being addressed by IOSCO, particularly through the IOSCO MMoU to which the Commission is a signatory.
In accordance with our independent statutory functions and powers, we work with the Minister of Commerce and the Ministry of Economic Development on policy, regulatory matters, law reform, and appropriations. We report to these authorities on our achievements under our output agreement and in our annual report.
Under the Securities Markets Act we have a co-regulatory role with the NZX over the markets operated by that exchange. NZX is currently the sole registered exchange in New Zealand.
We also work with other government agencies including the Registrar of Companies, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Serious Fraud Office, Commerce Commission, Retirement Commission, Police, and State Services Commission, as appropriate and in accordance with our statutory functions and powers.
We work with overseas securities regulators and agencies in accordance with the IOSCO MMoU, bilateral MOUs and applicable law.
We also work with a variety of industry organisations and professional bodies.
The Commission has a formal planning process and a strategic plan. The planning process includes a risk-based assessment of the Commission's areas of responsibility which enables it to efficiently allocate its resources and prioritise its activities.
The strategic plan is kept under active review. Some aspects of securities regulation are currently under review by the government. These include financial intermediaries, the wider law relating to financial products and providers, and anti-money laundering supervision. It is likely that reforms arising from these reviews will impact upon the Commission's strategic plan within the period of this statement of intent.
The Commission's strategic plan for the next three years sets out the outcomes it seeks to contribute to, and the main objectives it expects to achieve in six key result areas. These are explained below, together with the measures we intend to use to judge our success.
The Commission undertakes work to enforce securities laws. Other agencies and securities holders also have roles in securities law enforcement. The outcome we aim to contribute to is that bad market practice is seen to be unacceptable and the law is complied with, thereby contributing to the integrity of New Zealand's securities markets.
The Commission has determined objectives to be achieved to contribute to this outcome during the next three financial years. They include:
Objective - enforcement work is targeted at those issues most likely to deter bad practice in key areas of market practice.
Objective - our actions are seen to have been effective under our enforcement powers.
Objective - our responses to enforcement requests from overseas regulatory bodies are provided on time.
The Commission will have successfully achieved these objectives when it has:
The Commission monitors the securities markets and has statutory oversight of offerings of securities to the public, the behaviour of market participants, and the role of the NZX as regulator of the stock exchange. The outcome we seek to contribute to is that the integrity of and confidence in the markets are maintained and improved.
The Commission has determined objectives to be achieved to contribute to this outcome during the next three financial years. These include:
Objective - monitoring and market oversight work is targeted at those issues most likely to deter bad practices in key areas.
Objective - NZX fulfils its regulatory role in the market.
Objective - stakeholders, including co-regulators, fulfil their responsibilities in accordance with the law.
The Commission will have successfully achieved these objectives when it has:
The Commission reviews and comments on law and practices relating to securities. The outcome we seek to achieve is that the regulatory environment is relevant and effective.
The Commission has determined objectives to be achieved to contribute to this outcome during the next three financial years. They include:
Objective - a regime is in place for financial intermediaries which is relevant and enforceable.
Objective - securities law is up-to-date and useful and meets IOSCO principles.
Objective - there are appropriate standards of regulating financial reporting practices of issuers and appropriate auditor oversight.
The Commission will have successfully achieved these outcomes, or contributed to their successful achievement, when it has:
The Commission grants exemptions from aspects of securities law, subject to conditions that reflect the spirit of the law, and authorises certain market participants. The outcome we aim to contribute to is that securities law regimes are tailored to the needs of the markets.
The Commission has determined objectives to be achieved to contribute to this outcome during the next three financial years. They include:
Objective - all exemptions and authorisations are completed within the agreed time.
Objective - an effective regime is in place to regulate approval of trustees and statutory supervisors and authorisation of futures dealers.
The Commission will have successfully achieved these objectives when it has:
New Zealand is part of the global securities markets. The Commission's international work promotes our markets overseas, contributes a New Zealand view in international forums, contributes to the work of IOSCO, and enables us to fulfil our obligations under the IOSCO MMoU and bi-lateral MOUs. The outcome that we aim to contribute to is that New Zealand's markets and regulatory environment are respected internationally, creating a climate for increased investment and good relationships with overseas regulators.
The Commission has determined objectives to be achieved to contribute to this outcome during the next three financial years. They include:
Objective - the Commission's performance within the existing legislative framework is positively regarded internationally.
Objective - the Commission makes an effective contribution to the work and development of IOSCO and other relevant international bodies.
Objective - the Commission assesses recommendations of international bodies and their relevance to New Zealand.
Objective - the Commission is well-informed of relevant international developments and trends.
Objective - the Commission has a strong relationship with ASIC.
The Commission will have successfully achieved these objectives, or contributed to their successful achievement, when it:
The Commission undertakes a range of communications activities. The outcome it aims to contribute to is to increase public understanding of the law and practice of securities and the Commission's presence in the markets. The Commission works with other agencies including Enterprise New Zealand Trust, Retirement Commission, and Ministry of Consumer Affairs to further financial education.
The Commission has determined objectives to be achieved to contribute to this outcome during the next three financial years. They include:
Objective - investors and potential investors have access to information to help them understand the law and practice of securities.
Objective - people are aware of the work and views of the Commission.
The Commission will have successfully achieved these objectives when:
The Commission has developed a risk management framework. This identifies 25 issues/risks under the broad headings:
The risk management framework is reviewed and updated regularly. The Commission identified eight main risks:
The Commission has developed responses to each of them.
The Commission is committed to being a good employer. This is reflected in the results of the Unlimited/JRA Best Places to Work in New Zealand Survey, where we ranked number two of 69 in the small employer category in 2005. Our objective over the next three years is to keep our status as a good employer by continuing our values-based culture, being responsive to staff feedback, and continuing the human resource practices that have proven so effective. The Commission will continue to use the Unlimited/JRA Best Places to Work in New Zealand Survey to measure its performance as a good employer.
The Commission has difficulties recruiting qualified legal and accounting staff in the current job market. Unemployment is low and many young lawyers and accountants seek overseas experience. The Commission counters this by boosting graduate recruitment, intensifying overseas recruitment, and targeting New Zealand recruitment campaigns effectively.
The Commission is collaborating with these agencies for its organisational capability and health initiatives:
During 2006/07 the Securities Commission is appropriated to supply services under Vote Commerce, as follows:
2006/07 Vote Commerce $000 |
2005/06 Estimates $000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Non-departmental output expenses Performance of securities market functions |
6,501 |
5,983 |
| Other expenses to be incurred by the Crown Securities Commission litigation fund |
2,470 |
1,369 |
8,971 |
7,352 |
Further information is available in Part B, volume 1 of Budget 2006 - Estimates of Appropriation for the Government of New Zealand for the year ending 30 June 2007.
2006/07 Forecast $000 |
2005/06 Estimate $000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Income | ||
| Government grant | 6,501 |
5,478 |
| Administrative services to Takeovers Panel | 1,230 |
1,093 |
| Exemptions and authorisations fees | 235 |
223 |
| Interest | 120 |
117 |
| Other income | - |
12 |
| Litigation fund income – government grant and bank interest | 1,500 |
818 |
| Total income | 9,586 |
7,741 |
| Expense | ||
| Personnel expenses | 4,810 |
3,856 |
| Occupancy expenses | 501 |
499 |
| Depreciation | 389 |
432 |
| Other operating expenses | 2,374 |
1,681 |
| Litigation fund expense | 1,500 |
818 |
| Total expense | 9,574 |
7,286 |
| Surplus (deficit) | 12 |
455 |
| 2006/07 Forecast $000 |
2005/06 Estimate $000 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity | 3,611 | 3,599 | |
| Accumulated funds | 2,767 | 2,755 | |
| Litigation fund | 844 | 844 | |
| Assets | |||
| Current assets | 2,603 | 2,443 | |
| Non-current assets | 1,516 | 1,589 | |
| Liabilities | |||
| Current liabilities | 448 | 361 | |
| Non-current liabilities | 60 | 72 | |
| Net assets | 3,611 |
3,599 |
|
Accumulated funds $000 |
Litigation fund $000 |
Total equity $000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Actual at 1 July 2005 | 2,300 |
844 |
3,144 |
| Estimated surplus (deficit) for year | 455 |
- |
455 |
| Total estimated recognised income/expense for the year | 455 |
- |
455 |
| Estimate at 30 June 2006 | 2,755 |
844 |
3,599 |
| Forecast surplus (deficit) for year | 12 |
- |
12 |
| Total forecast recognised income/expense for the year | 12 |
- |
12 |
| Forecast at 30 June 2007 | 2,767 |
844 |
3,611 |
| 2006/07 Forecast $000 |
2005/06 Estimate $000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from operating activities | ||
| Cash was provided from | ||
| - Government grant | 6,501 | 5,478 |
| - Government grant - litigation fund | 1,403 | 596 |
| - Exemptions and authorisation fees | 235 | 213 |
| - Recovery of litigation and court costs | - | 286 |
| - Interest | 120 | 114 |
| - Administrative services to the Takeovers Panel | 1,230 | 1,099 |
| Cash was applied to | ||
| - Suppliers | (4,737) | (3,673) |
| - Employees | (4,374) | (3,385) |
| - Net GST | 2 | (29) |
| Net cash flows from operating activities | 380 | 699 |
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||
| Cash was provided from | ||
| - Sale of fixed assets | - | 2 |
| - Net decrease in term deposits | - | - |
| - Net decrease in term deposits (litigation) | - | - |
| Cash was applied to | ||
| - Purchase of fixed assets | (316) | (170) |
| - Net increase in term deposit | (100) | (800) |
| - Net increase in term deposit (litigation) | - | (174) |
| Net cash flows from investing activities | (416) | (1,142) |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash balances | (35) | (443) |
| Add opening cash and cash equivalents balance | 146 | 589 |
| Closing cash and cash equivalents balance carried forward | 111 | 146 |
| Comprising | ||
| Current account cash and cash equivalents | 100 | 48 |
| Litigation fund cash and cash equivalents | 11 | 98 |
| 111 | 146 |
The assumptions used in preparing the forecast information were adopted by the Securities Commission on 15 June 2006 and are as follows:
Government grant
We assume a government grant of $6,501,000 (excluding GST) for our operating activities. This is the amount appropriated to the Commission.
Administrative services to the Takeovers Panel
We have assumed recovery of $1,230,040 for services provided to the Takeovers Panel. This amount reflects an increase in the Panel's chargeable hours because of greater activity arising from its heightened enforcement powers and increased coverage of the Takeovers Code under the Securities Legislation Bill. The hourly rate is $115 per hour, higher because of an increase in Panel servicing costs.
Exemptions and authorisations income
We have assumed that our total income from fees and the recovery of costs under the Regulations will be $235,000. We have based this on our historical experience and expect the general historical pattern to apply.
Personnel expenses
We expect 50 staff positions (44 full time equivalents).
Litigation expense and fund We assume expenditure on approved litigation of $1,500,000. This is based on our most-likely litigation portfolio, arising from anticipated cases to be actioned, modeled on our historical experience. We expect to maintain the litigation fund at $843,750. We note the volatility inherent in predicting litigation activity. Actual litigation activity and expenditure may be materially different from forecast.
Occupancy and other operating costs We have based our occupancy and other operating costs on our historical experience. We expect the general historical pattern to continue.
Opening position for 2006/07
The 2005/06 estimate is based on management's judgments, estimates and assumptions of the final 2005/06 outcome and is used as the opening position for 2006/07 forecasts.
Estimated year end information for 2005/06 is used as the opening position for the 2006/07 forecasts.
Reporting entity
The forecast financial statements presented here for the reporting entity, the Securities Commission, are prepared pursuant to section 142 of the Crown Entities Act 2004. The Commission is a Crown entity for legislative purposes and a public benefit entity for financial reporting purposes.
These forecast financial statements have been prepared for the special purpose of the 2006/07 statement of intent of the Securities Commission to the Minister of Commerce. They are not prepared for any other purpose and should not be relied upon for any other purpose.
These forecast financial statements have not been reviewed or audited by our auditors, Audit New Zealand.
Statement of compliance
These forecast financial statements comprise prospective financial information and have been prepared in accordance with New Zealand Financial Reporting Standard No. 42: Prospective Financial Statements (FRS-42).
These are the Commission's first forecast financial statements prepared under New Zealand equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS). The Commission adopted NZ IFRS for the first time on 1 July 2005.
Basis of preparation
The preparation of forecast financial statements in conformity with FRS-42 requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Actual financial results achieved for the period covered are likely to vary from the information presented, and the variations may be material.
The accounting principles recognised as appropriate for the measurement and reporting of results and financial position on a historic cost basis have been applied.
These financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars rounded to the nearest thousand.
Accounting policies
Forecast figures
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Commission on the 15 June 2006. The forecast figures are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice and are consistent with the accounting policies adopted by Commission Members for the preparation of financial statements. The Commission is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure. It is not intended to update the forecast financial statements subsequent to publication of these statements.
Impact of adoption of NZ IFRS
On 1 July 2005 the Commission adopted New Zealand equivalents to IFRS for the first time. This required retrospective application of all NZ IFRSs to comparative information. Previously library collections were revalued regularly. The Commission decided for cost/benefit reasons to change to an accounting policy of recording these collections at cost. The Commission elected under NZ IFRS 1 to use a previous GAAP revaluation of library collections as deemed cost at the date of transition. This was the only option that the Commission has elected to take under NZ IFRS 1. This change in accounting policy did not affect total equity but simply involved the transfer of the revaluation reserve to accumulated funds of $44,330. The aggregate of the fair value of the library collections viewed as deemed cost as at 1 July 2004 was $155,754.
Changes in accounting policy
There have been no changes in accounting policies since the date of the last audited financial statements prepared under NZ GAAP, other than the impact of adoption of NZ IFRS as described above.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are shown at cost or deemed cost less depreciation and less any impairment losses (see Impairment below).
Library collections that were revalued to fair value immediately prior to 1 July 2004, the date of transition to IFRS, are measured on the basis of deemed cost, being the revalued amount at the date of that revaluation.
The following classes of property, plant and equipment have been depreciated over their economic lives on the following bases:
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents mean cash balances on hand, held in bank accounts in which the Commission invests as part of its day-to-day cash management. This excludes any term deposits held by the Commission.
Short-term deposits
Short term deposits are loans and receivables under NZ IFRS. Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables are recognised initially at fair value plus transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
Short-term employee benefits
Employee entitlements represent the Commission's liability for employee annual leave entitlements. This has been calculated on an accrued entitlement basis which involves recognising the undiscounted amount of short-term employee benefits expected to be paid in exchange for service that an employee has already rendered. This is calculated at current remuneration rates.
Operating leases
Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in the income statement on a straight line basis over the lease term after taking into account any lease inducements.
GST
All items in financial statements are exclusive of GST with the exception of accounts receivable and accounts payable which are stated with GST included.
Financial instruments
All financial instruments are recognised in the statement of financial position and all revenues and expenses in relation to financial instruments are recognised in the statement of financial performance.
Income tax
The Commission is exempt from income tax under the Income Tax Act 1994.
Revenue recognition
Government grant is recognised as revenue in the year in which it is appropriated. Revenue from exemptions and authorisations fees and from administrative services to the Takeovers Panel is recognised when the relevant services are provided.
Interest income is accrued using the effective interest rate method. The effective interest rate exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset's net carrying amount. The method applies this rate to the principal outstanding to determine interest income each period.
Cost allocation policy
For the purposes of the Statement of Forecast Service Performance direct costs are charged directly to outputs. Indirect costs are allocated on the basis of direct labour hours spent on each output.
Litigation fund
Reimbursements from the Crown to top up the fund are shown as income in the period in which the Commission's claim for reimbursement is accepted by the Crown. The balance of the fund is disclosed as a component of equity in the statement of financial position.
Impairment
The Commission considers at each reporting date whether there is any indication that a non-financial asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. Given that the future economic benefits of the Commission's assets are not directly related to the ability to generate net cash flows the value in use of these assets is measured on the basis of depreciated replacement cost.
At each balance date financial assets such as receivables are assessed for impairment. The recoverable amount is the present value of the estimated future cash flows.
An impairment loss is recognised in the income statement whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. Any reversal of impairment losses is also recognised in the income statement.
This is done by:
| Performance measures Monitoring and market oversight |
Performance standards | |
|---|---|---|
| 2006/2007 | 2005/06 Comparatives | |
| Quantity | ||
| Complete the enforcement actions that meet the Commission's case selection criteria, relating to the above matters. We expect there will be 5 such actions. | 5 |
4 |
| Quality | ||
| There is no successful challenge to the Commission's decisions or actions under the rules of natural justice. | 100% |
N/A |
| Enforcement actions comply with the Commission's internal processes. | Full compliance |
N/A |
| Timeliness | ||
| Progress civil enforcement actions from investigation to the filing of proceedings. | On average, within 24 months of commencement of investigation. |
N/A |
Complete other enforcement actions. Cost |
On average, within 6 months of commencement of action. 7% |
N/A
|
This is done by:
| Performance measures Monitoring and market oversight |
Performance standards | |
|---|---|---|
| 2006/2007 | 2005/06 Comparatives | |
| Quantity | ||
| Complete the monitoring and market oversight matters that meet the Commission's case selection criteria, relating to matters listed above. We expect there to be 200 of these. | 200 |
180 |
| Complete NZX oversight review. | 1 time in the year |
1 |
| Complete financial reporting surveillance programme. | 2 cycles in the year |
1 |
| Complete the review of disclosure by finance companies. | 1 |
N/A |
| Advise the Minister on proposed changes to Conduct Rules of the NZX. | 3 times in the year |
2 |
| Consider and comment on continuous disclosure applications under the MOU with the NZX. | 12 times |
8 |
| Quality | ||
| There is no successful challenge to the Commission's decisions or actions under the rules of natural justice. | 100% |
N/A |
| Monitoring and market oversight inquiries comply with the Commission's internal processes. | Full compliance |
N/A |
| Timeliness | ||
| Complete monitoring and market oversight matters. | Within 3 months of decision to commence inquiries |
Within 3 months of commencement |
| Complete NZX oversight review. | Within 6 months of commencement of review |
Within 6 months of commencement |
| Complete financial reporting surveillance programme. | On average, within 9 months of commencement of each cycle |
On average, within 9 months of commencement |
| Complete the review of disclosure by finance companies. | Within 12 months of commencement of review |
N/A |
Advice is provided to the Minister on approvals of, or proposed changes to, the Conduct Rules of NZX Ltd. within timeframes agreed with the NZX and allowing the Minister to exercise powers within the timeframes specified in the Securities Markets Act 1988. Cost |
100%
35% |
100%
32% |
Work, generally with NZICA and ASRB, on reviews of:
| Performance measures Monitoring and market oversight |
Performance standards | |
|---|---|---|
| 2006/2007 | 2005/06 Comparatives | |
| Quantity | ||
| Make recommendations for securities law reform and improved market practice in accordance with obligations under the Securities Act 1978 and other relevant legislation. | The Commission will make recommendations to comply with its obligations under the Securities Act 1978 and with other relevant legislation. The Commission's contributions to law reform will arise in particular from its experience gained in the course of its enforcement work. | The Commission will make recommendations to comply with its obligations under the Securities Act 1978 and with other relevant legislation. The Commission's contributions to law reform will arise in particular from its experience gained in the course of its enforcement work. |
| Review exposure drafts of financial reporting and auditing standards, and Financial Reporting Act. | Review as required. | Review as required |
| Participate on projects and reviews with the Ministry of Economic Development, other government departments and interested parties. | Participation as required. | Participation as required. |
| Quality | ||
| Reform recommendations are appropriate, given the prevailing securities law and practice. | The Commission will base its work on thorough and accurate research into, and analysis of, the existing law and practice | The Commission will base its work on thorough and accurate research into, and analysis of, the existing law and practice. |
| All reform recommendations comply with the Commission's internal processes. | Full compliance | Full compliance |
| Timeliness | ||
Provide information and responses to the Ministry of Economic Development and others within agreed timeframes. Cost |
100%
|
100%
|
Undertake special review projects relating to policy on exemptions.
Authorise futures dealers and exchanges.
Consider amendments to futures exchange rules.
Approve NZFOX participant rules.
Approve trustees and statutory supervisors.
Review existing authorisations.
| Performance measures Monitoring and market oversight |
Performance standards | |
|---|---|---|
| 2006/2007 | 2005/06 Comparatives | |
| Quantity | ||
| Consider applications for exemptions and authorisations of market participants. | Exemptions 75 Authorisations 15 | 70 10 |
| Review existing exemption notices and authorisations. | As required. | As required |
| Quantity | ||
| The Regulations Review Committee does not disallow notices, and notices are not successfully challenged under the rules of natural justice. | 100% |
N/A |
| Proportion of notices issued which comply with the Commission's internal processes. | 100% |
N/A |
| Timeliness | ||
Percentage of exemption applications and authorisations completed within 6 weeks of receiving all necessary information or within otherwise agreed target period. CostExpenditure allocated to exemptions and authorisations |
100%
|
100%
|
Meet and confer with overseas regulators and institutional investors.
Contribute to implementation of the FSAP recommendations for New Zealand.
Respond to enquiries from overseas about New Zealand's regulatory regime.
Participate in the international standard setting process by completing comparative surveys on securities law and regulation.
Fulfill the obligations of an Appendix A signatory under the IOSCO MMoU.
Contribute towards trans-Tasman initiatives.
| Performance measures Monitoring and market oversight |
Performance standards | |
|---|---|---|
| 2006/2007 | 2005/06 Comparatives | |
| Quantity | ||
| Take part in the work of IOSCO's Executive Committee, Asia Pacific Regional Committee and Committee on the Implementation of Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation. | Participate, as required. | Participated, as required. |
| Meet regularly with overseas regulators and institutional investors. | Meet and confer, as required. | Met and conferred, as required |
| Contribute towards trans-Tasman initiatives. | Contribute. | Contributed. |
| Contribute towards implementation of the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) recommendations for New Zealand. | Contribute. | Contributed. |
| Quantity | ||
| The Commission will present itself as a constructive and cooperative member of the international community of regulators. Views expressed to IOSCO will take into account the relevant New Zealand values and principles. | The Commission bases its presentations and views to the international community of regulators on sound research, consultation and analysis. | The Commission based its presentations and views to the international community of regulators on sound research, consultation and analysis. |
| Timeliness | ||
| Attendance at meetings and responses to committees provided, within agreed timeframes. | 100% |
100% |
| Contribute towards trans-Tasman initiatives, within agreed time. | 100% |
100% |
| Contribute towards implementation of the Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP) recommendations for New Zealand, within agreed time frames. Cost |
100%
|
100%
|
| Performance measures Monitoring and market oversight |
Performance standards | |
|---|---|---|
| 2006/2007 | 2005/06 Comparatives | |
| Quantity | ||
| Publish The Bulletin. | 4 times a year | 4 times a year |
| Deal with inquiries from the public. | 1,400 a year | 1,400 a year |
| Manage the Commission's website. | Website is available. | Website is available |
| Maintain relationships with the news media. | Liaison as required. | Liaison as required. |
| Continue the Commission's public education programme. | Develop and implement approved sub-projects. | Develop and implement approved sub-projects. |
| Quality | ||
| Readers respond that The Bulletin is interesting and relevant. | 80% of reader response to survey. | 80% of reader response to survey. |
| Education programme meets target objectives. | Objectives for each sub-project are met. | Objectives for each sub-project are met. |
| Inquiries are dealt with effectively. | Absence of material number of complaints. | Absence of material number of complaints. |
| Information on the website is relevant and accurate. | Accuracy and relevance of content. | Accuracy and relevance of content. |
| Relationships with the news media are constructive. | Commission and media enjoy mutual respect. | Commission and media enjoy mutual respect. | Timeliness |
| The Bulletin is produced on time. | January/April/July/October. | January/April/July/October. |
| Education programme development is achieved to agreed timetable. | Achieve sub-projects milestones. | Achieve sub-projects milestones. |
| Inquiries are handled within 5 working days of receipt. | 95% | 95% |
| Information on the website is up-to-date. | At all times. | At all times. |
Meetings with, and responses to, news media meet agreed timetable. Costs |
At all times.
11% |
At all times.
12% |
| Performance measures Monitoring and market oversight |
Performance standards | |
|---|---|---|
| 2006/2007 | 2005/06 Comparatives | |
| Takeovers Panel | ||
| Quantity, Quality and Timeliness | ||
Services are provided as per the MOU between the Panel and the Commission. Costs |
In accordance with the MOU
|
In accordance with the MOU
|
Class of output - Performance of Securities Market Functions (Vote Commerce)
2006/07 Forecast $000 |
2005/06 Estimates $000 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Expected revenue | 8,086 | 6,923 | |
| Proposed expenses | 8,074 | 6,468 | |
| Operating surplus/(deficit) | 12 | 455 | |
Litigation fund
2006/07 Vote Commerce $000 |
2005/06 Estimates $000 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Expected revenue | 1,500 | 818 | |
| Proposed expenses | 1,500 | 818 | |
| Litigation surplus/(deficit) | - | - | |
This information is provided pursuant to section 142(2)(b), Crown Entities Act 2004.