|
|
 |
2003 Annual Report
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES
for the year ended 30 June 2003
Funds are to be appropriated by Parliament for the year to 30 June 2003 for the stated purpose of:
" |
|
Enforcement - enforcing the law (including taking civil enforcement actions for suspected insider trading and continuous disclosure breaches) and carrying out inspections in relation to suspected securities law infringements; maintaining oversight of securities market activity and the supervision of securities exchanges, including activity on or by any securities exchange; intervening in the interests of investors in accordance with statutory powers. |
| |
| |
|
Authorisations - considering and deciding on applications for authorisation of market participants, for example futures exchanges and dealers, trustees and statutory supervisors. |
| |
| |
|
Exemptions - considering and deciding on applications for exemptions from the
provisions of the Securities Act and Regulations. |
| |
| |
|
Reform - reviewing securities law and practice and making recommendations
for reform. |
| |
| |
|
International liaison - promoting New Zealand as a well-regulated country;
keeping abreast of developments in global standard setting and contributing the
Commission's view to this process. |
| |
| |
|
Public understanding - promoting public understanding of the law and practice of securities." |
| |
(Estimates of Appropriations for the Government of New Zealand for the year ending 30 June 2003, volume 1, page 155).
STATEMENT OF SERVICE PERFORMANCE
for the year ended 30 June 2003
- A.
- PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MEASURES FOR THE OUTPUTS OF THE COMMISSION
|
OUTPUT 1
|
|
Enforcement - enforce the law (including taking civil actions for
suspected insider trading and continuous disclosure breaches) and
carry out inspections relating to suspected securities law infringements;
maintain oversight of securities market activity and supervision of
securities exchanges including activity on or by a securities exchange;
inquire into suspected breaches of securities law and intervene in the
interests of investors in accordance with our statutory powers.
|
|
Outcomes
|
| |
Good standards of disclosure.
Reliable procedures and ethical practices for effecting transactions.
Compliance with the law.
Bad market practice is seen to be unacceptable.
|
| |
|
Activities included
|
| |
To inquire into and if necessary take enforcement action, in particular, on:
| |
|
dubious investment schemes, |
| |
|
offer documents, |
| |
|
contributory mortgages, |
| |
|
financial statements of public issuers, |
| |
|
substantial security holder disclosure, |
| |
|
insider trading, |
| |
|
continuous disclosure, |
| |
|
disclosure of directors' dealings, |
| |
|
practices of investment advisers, |
| |
|
practices of fund managers, |
| |
|
requests from overseas commissions. |
This is done by:
| |
|
carrying out inspections, |
| |
|
prohibiting advertising, |
| |
|
removing offer documents from the market, |
| |
|
commenting publicly on market practice, |
| |
|
taking civil enforcement action in the Courts (in relation to substantial security holder
disclosure, insider trading, continuous disclosure and disclosure of directors' dealings), and |
| |
|
overseeing the operations of the NZX. |
(Some of these functions only became effective on 1 December 2002.)
|
| |
| Quantity |
|
The Commission completed 105 surveillance or enforcement inquiries (budget for the year 120)
including inquiries related to insider trading, substantial security holder disclosure, offer
documents, financial reporting and investment advisers. The Commission completed 2 major
enforcement inquiries and continued with another 2 major inquiries (budget for the year 4).
It did not take any cases to the High Court (budget for the year 4).
|
| |
| Quality |
|
The Commission acted in response to the needs of investors and other market participants
and in accordance with the law including, where appropriate, the rules of natural justice. It
based its work on sensible interpretations of securities laws and their application in a
constructive and practical way to securities market practice. It acted independently.
|
| |
|
Timeliness
|
| |
The Commission endeavoured, consistent with the interests of investors, to complete its
enforcement work in a way that made best use of resources committed by both market
participants and the Commission. It gave priority to inquiries raising significant issues for
investors and the market. The Commission endeavoured to complete its enforcement work
promptly. Where appropriate, results of its inquiries were communicated without delay to
market participants and the public so that they derived maximum benefit.
The Commission met agreed timetables for activity on behalf of other commissions.
|
| |
| Cost |
|
The Commission allocated 39.9% of its expenditure to this output (budget for the year 43.0%).
|
|
OUTPUT 2
|
|
Authorisations - consider and decide on applications for authorisation of
market participants, for example futures exchanges and dealers,
trustees and statutory supervisors; review existing authorisations.
|
|
Outcomes
|
| |
Securities law regimes tailored to the needs of the market.
Compliance with the law.
Reliable procedures and ethical practices for effecting transactions.
|
| |
|
Activities included
|
| |
To authorise futures dealers and exchanges.
To consider amendments to futures exchange rules.
To approve trustees and statutory supervisors.
To review existing authorisations.
|
| |
| Quantity |
|
The Commission considered 7 applications (budget for the year 15) and undertook a review of
futures dealers authorisation policy.
|
| |
| Quality |
|
All notices were issued in accordance with the law including, where appropriate, the rules of
natural justice.
|
| |
|
Timeliness
|
| |
The Commission decided on applications within timeframes agreed with applicants.
|
| |
| Cost |
|
The Commission allocated 2.4% of its expenditure to this output (budget for the year 4.0%).
|
|
OUTPUT 3
|
|
Exemptions - consider and decide on applications for exemptions from
the provisions of the Securities Act, the Securities Markets Act and
Securities Regulations.
|
|
Outcomes
|
| |
Securities law regimes tailored to the needs of the market.
Good standards of disclosure.
Flexibility in development of best regulatory practice.
Sound principles for market regulation.
Cost-effective rules of law.
|
| |
|
Activities included
|
| |
To receive and consider applications.
To review existing exemptions.
To undertake special review projects relating to policy on existing or new exemptions.
|
| |
| Quantity |
|
The Commission considered 51 new applications for exemption from securities law (budget for
the year 80) and reviewed 52 existing exemption notices (budget for the year "as required"). The
Commission completed 6 special review projects relating to its policy on existing or potential
new exemptions (budget for the year 6).
|
| |
| Quality |
|
All notices were issued in accordance with the law including, where appropriate, the rules of
natural justice. The Commission based its work on sensible interpretations of securities law
and its application in a constructive and practical way to securities market practice. It
consulted extensively on new policy and on its formal expression in exemption notices.
It acted independently.
|
| |
|
Timeliness
|
| |
The Commission considered applications and made decisions within timeframes
agreed with applicants.
|
| |
| Cost |
|
The Commission allocated 11.8% of its expenditure to this output (budget for the year 11.0%).
|
|
OUTPUT 4
|
|
Reform - review securities law and practice and make recommendations
for reform.
|
|
Outcomes
|
| |
A relevant regulatory environment.
Good standards of disclosure.
Reliable procedures and ethical practices for effecting transactions.
Flexibility in development of best regulatory practice.
Sound principles for market regulation.
Cost-effective rules of law.
|
| |
|
Activities/Quantity
|
| |
The Commission worked, generally with the Ministry of Economic Development, on
projects and reviews of:
| |
|
the Securities Regulations 1983, |
| |
|
the Securities Act 1978:
| - |
|
administration and efficiency, |
| - |
|
surveillance and detection powers, |
| - |
|
exemption powers, |
|
| |
|
investment advisers, |
| |
|
insider trading and market manipulation, |
| |
|
substantial security holder disclosure, and |
| |
|
regulation of stock exchanges. |
Other review projects included:
| |
|
exposure drafts of financial reporting standards of ICANZ and ASRB, |
| |
|
application of the Fair Trading and Consumer Guarantees Act to securities and futures
contracts. |
|
| |
| Quality |
|
The Commission complied with its obligations under the Securities Act 1978 and with other
relevant legislation. It based its work on accurate research into, and analysis of, existing law
and practice. It took into account the regulatory impact and business compliance costs of
reforms. The Commission aimed to simplify the expression and content of the law.
It consulted widely and acted independently.
|
| |
| Timeliness |
| |
The Commission provided information and responses to the Ministry of Economic Development
and others within agreed timeframes on 100% of projects (budget for the year 100%). |
| |
| Cost |
|
The Commission allocated 6.2% of its expenditure to this output (budget for the year 7.0%). |
| OUTPUT 5 |
|
International Liaison - promote New Zealand as a well regulated country;
keep abreast of developments in global standard setting and contribute
the Commission's views to this process; maintain good relationships with
other regulators. |
| Outcomes |
| |
New Zealand is respected in the international securities markets resulting in increased
investment and cooperation.
New Zealand's standing in the international community as a responsible and well regulated
country is increased.
Domestic policy and practice are developed in the context of a sound understanding of best
international policy and practice.
Good working relations with overseas regulators.
Strong public and institutional confidence in New Zealand markets. |
| |
| Activities |
| |
The Commission took part in the work of IOSCO's President's and Executive Committees,
the Asia Pacific Regional Committee and the Committee on the Implementation of
Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation.
The Commission promoted improved communication through regulatory agencies globally
in relation to:
| |
|
overseas regulatory practices, |
| |
|
market malpractice, |
in particular in respect of cross border offers of securities.
The Commission met and conferred with overseas regulators and institutional investors.
The Commission worked with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and other agencies to
prepare for the Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP) evaluation of New Zealand
expected to take place in October/November 2003. |
| |
| Quantity |
|
The Commission attended the two meetings of the IOSCO Executive Committee held in
the period, and the Asia Pacific Regional Committee meetings, and fulfilled its commitment
to IOSCO for the period (budget for the year 100%). The Chairman attended the Financial
Stability Forum. |
| |
| Quality |
|
The Commission presented itself as a constructive and cooperative member of the
international community of regulators. Any views expressed to IOSCO and others took into
account relevant New Zealand values and principles. |
| |
| Timeliness |
| |
The Commission endeavoured, within available resources, to meet the timeframes of overseas
agencies. |
| |
| Cost |
|
The Commission allocated 9.3% of its expenditure to this output (budget for the year 8.0%). |
| OUTPUT 6 |
|
Public Understanding - promote public understanding of the law and
practice of securities. |
| Outcomes |
| |
The Commission has a presence in the market and people know what we do and where we
stand on issues affecting the markets.
Public and institutional confidence in New Zealand markets.
Compliance with the law. |
| |
| Activities |
| |
To publish The Bulletin, annual report and other documents.
To maintain and develop the website.
To publish exemption summaries on the website.
To respond to public inquiries.
To maintain contact with the news media and otherwise provide information to the public.
To deliver speeches, articles and presentations. |
| |
| Quantity |
|
The Commission published 4 issues of The Bulletin (budget for the year 4 issues) and issued
29 news releases (budget for the year "as required"). It published 81 summaries of
exemptions granted.
The Chairman and staff gave 22 formal speeches and attended 10 functions specifically
arranged for discussion with market participants.
The Commission received 1,566 miscellaneous inquiries from members of the public (budget
for the year 2000). |
| |
| Quality |
|
The Commission based its work on observed market practice and on sensible interpretations
of securities law. It aimed to simplify the expression and content of the law. Material in The
Bulletin, speeches, and articles was current, relevant and useful. The website was up to date
and easy for visitors to use. |
| |
| Timeliness |
| |
The annual report was published on 26 July 2002 (budget for the year - report to be published
within one month of the end of the financial year). The Bulletin was published in July, October,
January and April (budget July, October, January and April).
Other public understanding projects were completed on time. All but 3 of the 1566 public
inquiries were actioned within 5 working days of receipt (budget for the year 100%). |
| |
| Cost |
|
The Commission allocated 9.2% of its expenditure to this output (budget for the year 10.0%). |
| OUTPUT 7 |
|
Takeovers Panel - provide administrative and support services by
agreement. |
| Outcomes |
| |
To provide services in accordance with an annual agreement concluded under the terms of
a Memorandum of Understanding between the Panel and the Commission. |
| |
| Activities |
| |
To provide services related to the Panel's outputs including:
| |
|
Review of Takeovers Code, |
| |
|
Approvals, |
| |
|
Exemptions, |
| |
|
Enforcement, |
| |
|
Market Practice, |
| |
|
Public Understanding, |
| |
|
International Liaison, |
| |
|
Administration. |
|
| |
| Quantity, |
|
Quality, and Timeliness for services were as provided for in the Memorandum of
Understanding between the Panel and the Commission. |
| |
| Cost |
|
The Commission allocated 21.2% of its expenditure to this output and recovered this amount
from the Panel (budget for the year 17.0%). |
| |
- B.
- GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
| Governance |
| |
 |
Commission Members are appointed by the Governor-General on the recommendation of
the Minister of Commerce having regard to their qualifications, experience, skill and
reputation for integrity in the public market for securities. New appointments are made
only after extensive advertising in the newspapers and personal interview by representatives
of the Minister and the Commission.
All aspects of work were kept under continuing review by regular reporting to Commission
Members and by frequent meetings of the Commission. A total of 211 meetings were held
during the 2003 financial year (11 regular monthly meetings and 200 division meetings
including telephone conferences with decisions confirmed by resolutions in writing).
Where matters of significant policy arose at quorum meetings they were referred to a full
meeting for further consideration by all Commission Members.
The Commission reported quarterly to the Minister of Commerce.
The Commission has an Audit Committee chaired by a chartered accountant. It met on 4
occasions during the year. |
| |
| Work Priorities |
| |
| |
Work priorities were reviewed at each monthly meeting of the Commission and the
complete work programme was reviewed quarterly.
All requests for new work were assessed promptly. When new work could not be
undertaken because it was not within the Commission's terms of reference, because it was
not within established priorities or because another agency might be able to provide more
relevant or more effective service, applicants were notified promptly.
Priority was given to enforcement, in particular to contributory mortgages, the review of
offer documents, the activities of investment advisers and insider trading.
Priority was given to work on exemptions and authorisations. The Commission aimed to
provide a prompt, relevant and effective service so that the reasonable expectations of
market participants were met and their activities were not delayed or inhibited.
|
|
 |